Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefin tuna, cooked
Bluefin tuna, cooked2
VS
Skipjack tuna, cooked Leader
Skipjack tuna, cooked6

Skipjack tuna, cooked leads 6–2 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Skipjack tuna, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bluefin tuna, cooked for more protein and more magnesium.

Pick Skipjack tuna, cooked for less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    184 kcal
    132 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.91 g
    28.21 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    6.28 g
    1.29 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.61 g
    0.42 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    50 mg
    47 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    323 mg
    522 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    10 mg
    37 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    1.31 mg
    1.6 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN64 mg
    44 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    1 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefin tuna, cooked vs Skipjack tuna, cooked · Foodatron