Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefin tuna, cooked
Bluefin tuna, cooked4
VS
Snapper, cooked
Snapper, cooked4

Dead heat · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

It's a dead heat — each wins 4 of 8 match-ups.

Pick Bluefin tuna, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Snapper, cooked for less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    184 kcal
    128 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.91 g
    26.3 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    6.28 g
    1.72 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.61 g
    0.37 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN50 mg
    57 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    323 mg
    522 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    10 mg
    40 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.31 mg
    0.24 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN64 mg
    37 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    1.6 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefin tuna, cooked vs Snapper, cooked · Foodatron