Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefin tuna, cooked Leader
Bluefin tuna, cooked4
VS
Spot, cooked
Spot, cooked3

Bluefin tuna, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Bluefin tuna, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bluefin tuna, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Spot, cooked for less sodium, more potassium and more calcium.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    184 kcal
    158 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.91 g
    23.73 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    6.28 g
    6.28 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.61 g
    1.86 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    50 mg
    37 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    323 mg
    636 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    10 mg
    18 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.31 mg
    0.41 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN64 mg
    54 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefin tuna, cooked vs Spot, cooked · Foodatron