Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefin tuna, cooked Leader
Bluefin tuna, cooked4
VS
Turbot, cooked
Turbot, cooked3

Bluefin tuna, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Bluefin tuna, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bluefin tuna, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium and more iron.

Pick Turbot, cooked for more calcium, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    184 kcal
    122 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.91 g
    20.58 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    6.28 g
    3.78 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.61 g
    —
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN50 mg
    192 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN323 mg
    305 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    10 mg
    23 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.31 mg
    0.46 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    64 mg
    65 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    1.7 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefin tuna, cooked vs Turbot, cooked · Foodatron