Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefish, cooked
Bluefish, cooked4
VS
Shrimp, canned
Shrimp, canned4

Dead heat · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Bluefish, cooked: 100 g · Shrimp, canned: 100 g.

The verdict

It's a dead heat — each wins 4 of 8 match-ups.

Pick Bluefish, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium and more magnesium.

Pick Shrimp, canned for less saturated fat, more calcium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    159 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN25.69 g
    20.42 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total fat
    5.44 g
    1.36 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.17 g
    0.19 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN77 mg
    870 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN477 mg
    80 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    9 mg
    145 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.62 mg
    2.13 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN42 mg
    33 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    4.1 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefish, cooked vs Shrimp, canned · Foodatron