Bluefish, cooked vs Shrimp, canned

Bluefish, cooked2

Leader

Shrimp, canned6

Shrimp, canned leads 6–2 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Shrimp, canned comes out ahead, winning 6 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bluefish, cooked for less sodium and more potassium.

Pick Shrimp, canned for more protein, less saturated fat, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common serving Equal calories

Head-to-head

Energy
100 kcal
100 kcal
Proteinmore is better
16.16 g
20.42 gWIN
Carbohydrate
0 g
0 g
Fibermore is better
0 g
0 g
Total sugarsless is better
—
0 g
Total fat
3.42 g
1.36 g
Saturated fatless is better
0.74 g
0.19 gWIN
Sodiumless is better
WIN48.43 mg
870 mg
Potassiummore is better
WIN300 mg
80 mg
Calciummore is better
5.66 mg
145 mgWIN
Ironmore is better
0.39 mg
2.13 mgWIN
Magnesiummore is better
26.42 mg
33 mgWIN
Vitamin Cmore is better
0 mg
4.1 mgWIN
Vitamin Dmore is better
—
—

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.