Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefish, cooked Leader
Bluefish, cooked4
VS
Cod, cooked
Cod, cooked3

Bluefish, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Bluefish, cooked: 100 g · Cod, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Bluefish, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bluefish, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium and more iron.

Pick Cod, cooked for less saturated fat, more calcium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber and magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    159 kcal
    105 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN25.69 g
    22.83 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total fat
    5.44 g
    0.86 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.17 g
    0.17 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN77 mg
    78 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN477 mg
    244 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    9 mg
    14 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN0.62 mg
    0.49 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    42 mg
    42 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    1 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefish, cooked vs Cod, cooked · Foodatron