Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefish, cooked
Bluefish, cooked3
VS
Coho salmon, cooked Leader
Coho salmon, cooked5

Coho salmon, cooked leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Coho salmon, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bluefish, cooked for less saturated fat, more potassium and more magnesium.

Pick Coho salmon, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more calcium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    159 kcal
    184 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    25.69 g
    27.36 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    5.44 g
    7.5 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.17 g
    1.6 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    77 mg
    53 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN477 mg
    455 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    9 mg
    46 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.62 mg
    0.71 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN42 mg
    35 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    1 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefish, cooked vs Coho salmon, cooked · Foodatron