Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefish, cooked Leader
Bluefish, cooked4
VS
Croaker, cooked
Croaker, cooked3

Bluefish, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Bluefish, cooked: 100 g · Croaker, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Bluefish, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bluefish, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium and more potassium.

Pick Croaker, cooked for more fiber, more calcium and more iron.

Evenly matched on magnesium and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    159 kcal
    221 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN25.69 g
    18.2 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    7.54 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0.4 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    5.44 g
    12.67 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.17 g
    3.48 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN77 mg
    348 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN477 mg
    340 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    9 mg
    32 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.62 mg
    0.86 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    42 mg
    42 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefish, cooked vs Croaker, cooked · Foodatron