Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefish, cooked
Bluefish, cooked3
VS
Imitation crab Leader
Imitation crab5

Imitation crab leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Imitation crab comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bluefish, cooked for more protein, less sodium and more potassium.

Pick Imitation crab for more fiber, less saturated fat, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN16.16 g
    8.02 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    15.79 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0.53 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    6.58 g
  • Total fat
    3.42 g
    0.48 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.74 g
    0.23 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN48.43 mg
    556.84 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN300 mg
    94.74 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    5.66 mg
    13.68 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.39 mg
    0.41 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    26.42 mg
    45.26 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefish, cooked vs Imitation crab · Foodatron