Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefish, cooked
Bluefish, cooked3
VS
King crab, cooked Leader
King crab, cooked5

King crab, cooked leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

King crab, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bluefish, cooked for more protein, less sodium and more potassium.

Pick King crab, cooked for less saturated fat, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    159 kcal
    97 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN25.69 g
    19.35 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    5.44 g
    1.54 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.17 g
    0.13 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN77 mg
    1072 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN477 mg
    262 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    9 mg
    59 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.62 mg
    0.76 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    42 mg
    63 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    7.6 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefish, cooked vs King crab, cooked · Foodatron