Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefish, cooked
Bluefish, cooked4
VS
Mackerel, cooked
Mackerel, cooked4

Dead heat · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Bluefish, cooked: 100 g · Mackerel, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

It's a dead heat — each wins 4 of 8 match-ups.

Pick Bluefish, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium and more potassium.

Pick Mackerel, cooked for more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    159 kcal
    262 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN25.69 g
    23.85 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    5.44 g
    17.81 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.17 g
    4.18 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN77 mg
    83 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN477 mg
    401 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    9 mg
    15 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.62 mg
    1.57 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    42 mg
    97 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0.4 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefish, cooked vs Mackerel, cooked · Foodatron