Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefish, cooked
Bluefish, cooked3
VS
Monkfish, cooked Leader
Monkfish, cooked4

Monkfish, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 1 tie

Bluefish, cooked: 100 g · Monkfish, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Monkfish, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bluefish, cooked for more protein, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Monkfish, cooked for less sodium, more potassium, more calcium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    159 kcal
    97 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN25.69 g
    18.56 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    5.44 g
    1.95 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.17 g
    —
  • Sodiumless is better
    77 mg
    23 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    477 mg
    513 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    9 mg
    10 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN0.62 mg
    0.41 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN42 mg
    27 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    1 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefish, cooked vs Monkfish, cooked · Foodatron