Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefish, cooked
Bluefish, cooked3
VS
Northern pike, cooked Leader
Northern pike, cooked5

Northern pike, cooked leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Northern pike, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bluefish, cooked for more protein, more potassium and more magnesium.

Pick Northern pike, cooked for less saturated fat, less sodium, more calcium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    159 kcal
    113 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN25.69 g
    24.69 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    5.44 g
    0.88 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.17 g
    0.15 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    77 mg
    49 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN477 mg
    331 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    9 mg
    73 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.62 mg
    0.71 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN42 mg
    40 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    3.8 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefish, cooked vs Northern pike, cooked · Foodatron