Bluefish, cooked vs Northern pike, cooked

Bluefish, cooked1

Leader

Northern pike, cooked7

Northern pike, cooked leads 7–1 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Northern pike, cooked comes out ahead, winning 7 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bluefish, cooked for more potassium.

Pick Northern pike, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common serving Equal calories

Head-to-head

Energy
100 kcal
100 kcal
Proteinmore is better
16.16 g
21.85 gWIN
Carbohydrate
0 g
0 g
Fibermore is better
0 g
0 g
Total sugarsless is better
—
—
Total fat
3.42 g
0.78 g
Saturated fatless is better
0.74 g
0.13 gWIN
Sodiumless is better
48.43 mg
43.36 mgWIN
Potassiummore is better
WIN300 mg
292.92 mg
Calciummore is better
5.66 mg
64.6 mgWIN
Ironmore is better
0.39 mg
0.63 mgWIN
Magnesiummore is better
26.42 mg
35.4 mgWIN
Vitamin Cmore is better
0 mg
3.36 mgWIN
Vitamin Dmore is better
—
—

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.