Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefish, cooked
Bluefish, cooked3
VS
Pompano, cooked Leader
Pompano, cooked4

Pompano, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Pompano, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bluefish, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat and more magnesium.

Pick Pompano, cooked for less sodium, more potassium, more calcium and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    159 kcal
    211 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN25.69 g
    23.69 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    5.44 g
    12.14 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.17 g
    4.5 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    77 mg
    76 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    477 mg
    636 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    9 mg
    43 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.62 mg
    0.67 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN42 mg
    31 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefish, cooked vs Pompano, cooked · Foodatron