Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefish, cooked
Bluefish, cooked3
VS
Sablefish, cooked Leader
Sablefish, cooked4

Sablefish, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Bluefish, cooked: 100 g · Sablefish, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Sablefish, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bluefish, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat and more potassium.

Pick Sablefish, cooked for less sodium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    159 kcal
    250 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN25.69 g
    17.19 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    5.44 g
    19.62 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.17 g
    4.1 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    77 mg
    72 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN477 mg
    459 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    9 mg
    45 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.62 mg
    1.64 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    42 mg
    71 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefish, cooked vs Sablefish, cooked · Foodatron