Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefish, cooked
Bluefish, cooked3
VS
Smoked haddock Leader
Smoked haddock4

Smoked haddock leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Smoked haddock comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bluefish, cooked for more protein, less sodium and more potassium.

Pick Smoked haddock for less saturated fat, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    159 kcal
    116 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN25.69 g
    25.23 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total fat
    5.44 g
    0.96 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.17 g
    0.17 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN77 mg
    763 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN477 mg
    415 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    9 mg
    49 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.62 mg
    1.4 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    42 mg
    54 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefish, cooked vs Smoked haddock · Foodatron