Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefish, cooked Leader
Bluefish, cooked4
VS
Smoked salmon (lox)
Smoked salmon (lox)3

Bluefish, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Bluefish, cooked: 100 g · Smoked salmon (lox): 100 g.

The verdict

Bluefish, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bluefish, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium and more magnesium.

Pick Smoked salmon (lox) for less saturated fat, more calcium and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    159 kcal
    117 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN25.69 g
    18.28 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total fat
    5.44 g
    4.32 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.17 g
    0.93 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN77 mg
    672 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN477 mg
    175 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    9 mg
    11 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.62 mg
    0.85 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN42 mg
    18 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefish, cooked vs Smoked salmon (lox) · Foodatron