Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefish, cooked
Bluefish, cooked3
VS
Striped bass, cooked Leader
Striped bass, cooked4

Striped bass, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Striped bass, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bluefish, cooked for more protein, less sodium and more potassium.

Pick Striped bass, cooked for less saturated fat, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    159 kcal
    124 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN25.69 g
    22.73 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    5.44 g
    2.99 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.17 g
    0.65 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN77 mg
    88 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN477 mg
    328 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    9 mg
    19 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.62 mg
    1.08 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    42 mg
    51 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefish, cooked vs Striped bass, cooked · Foodatron