Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefish, cooked
Bluefish, cooked2
VS
Sturgeon, cooked Leader
Sturgeon, cooked4

Sturgeon, cooked leads 4–2 · 6 categories decided · 3 ties

Bluefish, cooked: 100 g · Sturgeon, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Sturgeon, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 6 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bluefish, cooked for more protein and more potassium.

Pick Sturgeon, cooked for less sodium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, saturated fat and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    159 kcal
    135 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN25.69 g
    20.7 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total fat
    5.44 g
    5.18 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.17 g
    1.17 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    77 mg
    69 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN477 mg
    364 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    9 mg
    17 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.62 mg
    0.9 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    42 mg
    45 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefish, cooked vs Sturgeon, cooked · Foodatron