Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefish, cooked Leader
Bluefish, cooked6
VS
Swordfish, cooked
Swordfish, cooked1

Bluefish, cooked leads 6–1 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Bluefish, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bluefish, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Swordfish, cooked for more potassium.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    159 kcal
    172 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN25.69 g
    23.45 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total fat
    5.44 g
    7.93 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.17 g
    1.91 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN77 mg
    97 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    477 mg
    499 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN9 mg
    6 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN0.62 mg
    0.45 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN42 mg
    35 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefish, cooked vs Swordfish, cooked · Foodatron