Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefish, cooked
Bluefish, cooked2
VS
Tilapia, cooked Leader
Tilapia, cooked5

Tilapia, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Bluefish, cooked: 100 g · Tilapia, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Tilapia, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bluefish, cooked for more potassium and more magnesium.

Pick Tilapia, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more calcium and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    159 kcal
    128 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    25.69 g
    26.15 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total fat
    5.44 g
    2.65 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.17 g
    0.94 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    77 mg
    56 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN477 mg
    380 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    9 mg
    14 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.62 mg
    0.69 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN42 mg
    34 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefish, cooked vs Tilapia, cooked · Foodatron