Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefish, cooked Leader
Bluefish, cooked4
VS
Canned white tuna in water
Canned white tuna in water3

Bluefish, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Bluefish, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bluefish, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium and more magnesium.

Pick Canned white tuna in water for less saturated fat, more calcium and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    159 kcal
    128 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN25.69 g
    23.62 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total fat
    5.44 g
    2.97 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.17 g
    0.79 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN77 mg
    377 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN477 mg
    237 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    9 mg
    14 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.62 mg
    0.97 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN42 mg
    33 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.