Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefish, cooked
Bluefish, cooked3
VS
Whitefish, cooked
Whitefish, cooked3

Dead heat · 6 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

It's a dead heat — each wins 3 of 6 match-ups.

Pick Bluefish, cooked for more protein, more potassium and more iron.

Pick Whitefish, cooked for less saturated fat, less sodium and more calcium.

Evenly matched on fiber, magnesium and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    159 kcal
    172 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN25.69 g
    24.47 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    5.44 g
    7.51 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.17 g
    1.16 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    77 mg
    65 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN477 mg
    406 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    9 mg
    33 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN0.62 mg
    0.47 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    42 mg
    42 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefish, cooked vs Whitefish, cooked · Foodatron