Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefish, cooked
Bluefish, cooked1
VS
Yellowfin tuna, cooked Leader
Yellowfin tuna, cooked5

Yellowfin tuna, cooked leads 5–1 · 6 categories decided · 3 ties

Bluefish, cooked: 100 g · Yellowfin tuna, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Yellowfin tuna, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 6 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bluefish, cooked for more calcium.

Pick Yellowfin tuna, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber, magnesium and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    159 kcal
    130 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    25.69 g
    29.15 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total fat
    5.44 g
    0.59 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.17 g
    0.21 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    77 mg
    54 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    477 mg
    527 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN9 mg
    4 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    0.62 mg
    0.92 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    42 mg
    42 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefish, cooked vs Yellowfin tuna, cooked · Foodatron