Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Brown sugar
Brown sugar2
VS
Maple sugar Leader
Maple sugar6

Maple sugar leads 6–2 · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Maple sugar comes out ahead, winning 6 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Brown sugar for more protein and less saturated fat.

Pick Maple sugar for less sugar, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    380 kcal
    354 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN0.12 g
    0.1 g
  • Carbohydrate
    98.09 g
    90.9 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    97.02 g
    84.87 gWIN
  • Total fat
    0 g
    0.2 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0 g
    0.04 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    28 mg
    11 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    133 mg
    274 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    83 mg
    90 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.71 mg
    1.61 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    9 mg
    19 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Brown sugar vs Maple sugar · Foodatron