Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Bulgur, cooked Leader
Bulgur, cooked7
VS
Sweet potato, baked
Sweet potato, baked3

Bulgur, cooked leads 7–3 · 10 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Bulgur, cooked comes out ahead, winning 7 of 10 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bulgur, cooked for more protein, more fiber, less sugar, less saturated fat, less sodium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Sweet potato, baked for more potassium, more calcium and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    83 kcal
    90 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN3.08 g
    2.01 g
  • Carbohydrate
    18.58 g
    20.71 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN4.5 g
    3.3 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN0.1 g
    6.48 g
  • Total fat
    0.24 g
    0.15 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.04 g
    0.05 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN5 mg
    36 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    68 mg
    475 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    10 mg
    38 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN0.96 mg
    0.69 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN32 mg
    27 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    19.6 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bulgur, cooked vs Sweet potato, baked · Foodatron