Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Sugar, granulated (white)
Sugar, granulated (white)2
VS
Maple sugar Leader
Maple sugar6

Maple sugar leads 6–2 · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Maple sugar comes out ahead, winning 6 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Sugar, granulated (white) for less saturated fat and less sodium.

Pick Maple sugar for more protein, less sugar, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    387 kcal
    354 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    0 g
    0.1 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    99.98 g
    90.9 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    99.8 g
    84.87 gWIN
  • Total fat
    0 g
    0.2 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0 g
    0.04 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN1 mg
    11 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    2 mg
    274 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    1 mg
    90 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.05 mg
    1.61 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    0 mg
    19 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Sugar, granulated (white) vs Maple sugar · Foodatron