Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Apples, canned
Apples, canned2
VS
Sour cherries, raw Leader
Sour cherries, raw8

Sour cherries, raw leads 8–2 · 10 categories decided

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Sour cherries, raw comes out ahead, winning 8 of 10 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Apples, canned for less saturated fat and less sodium.

Pick Sour cherries, raw for more protein, more fiber, less sugar, more potassium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    0.27 g
    2 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    25.13 g
    24.36 g
  • Fibermore is better
    2.99 g
    3.2 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    22.15 g
    16.98 gWIN
  • Total fat
    0.64 g
    0.6 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.1 g
    0.14 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN4.48 mg
    6 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    104.48 mg
    346 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    5.97 mg
    32 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.36 mg
    0.64 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    4.48 mg
    18 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0.3 mg
    20 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Apples, canned vs Sour cherries, raw · Foodatron