Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Canned tuna in water, drained
Canned tuna in water, drained3
VS
Chickpeas, cooked Leader
Chickpeas, cooked7

Chickpeas, cooked leads 7–3 · 10 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chickpeas, cooked comes out ahead, winning 7 of 10 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Canned tuna in water, drained for more protein, less sugar and less saturated fat.

Pick Chickpeas, cooked for more fiber, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    116 kcal
    164 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN25.51 g
    8.86 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    27.42 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    7.6 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN0 g
    4.8 g
  • Total fat
    0.82 g
    2.59 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.23 g
    0.27 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    50 mg
    7 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    237 mg
    291 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    11 mg
    49 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    1.53 mg
    2.89 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    27 mg
    48 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    1.3 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Canned tuna in water, drained vs Chickpeas, cooked · Foodatron