Canned tuna in water, drained vs Salmon, cooked

Canned tuna in water, drained4

Salmon, cooked4

Dead heat · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Canned tuna in water, drained: 100 g · Salmon, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

It's a dead heat — each wins 4 of 8 match-ups.

Pick Canned tuna in water, drained for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium and more iron.

Pick Salmon, cooked for more potassium, more calcium, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber and sugar.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common serving Equal calories

Head-to-head

Energy
116 kcal
206 kcal
Proteinmore is better
WIN25.51 g
22.1 g
Carbohydrate
0 g
0 g
Fibermore is better
0 g
0 g
Total sugarsless is better
0 g
0 g
Total fat
0.82 g
12.35 g
Saturated fatless is better
WIN0.23 g
2.4 g
Sodiumless is better
WIN50 mg
61 mg
Potassiummore is better
237 mg
384 mgWIN
Calciummore is better
11 mg
15 mgWIN
Ironmore is better
WIN1.53 mg
0.34 mg
Magnesiummore is better
27 mg
30 mgWIN
Vitamin Cmore is better
0 mg
3.7 mgWIN
Vitamin Dmore is better
—
—

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.