Canned tuna in water, drained vs Turkey breast, cooked

Leader

Canned tuna in water, drained4

Turkey breast, cooked3

Canned tuna in water, drained leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Canned tuna in water, drained comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Canned tuna in water, drained for less saturated fat, less sodium, more calcium and more iron.

Pick Turkey breast, cooked for more protein, more potassium and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common serving Equal calories

Head-to-head

Energy
116 kcal
147 kcal
Proteinmore is better
25.51 g
30.13 gWIN
Carbohydrate
0 g
0 g
Fibermore is better
0 g
0 g
Total sugarsless is better
0 g
0 g
Total fat
0.82 g
2.08 g
Saturated fatless is better
WIN0.23 g
0.59 g
Sodiumless is better
WIN50 mg
99 mg
Potassiummore is better
237 mg
249 mgWIN
Calciummore is better
WIN11 mg
9 mg
Ironmore is better
WIN1.53 mg
0.71 mg
Magnesiummore is better
27 mg
32 mgWIN
Vitamin Cmore is better
0 mg
0 mg
Vitamin Dmore is better
—
—

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.