Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Canned tuna in water, drained Leader
Canned tuna in water, drained6
VS
Whole egg, raw
Whole egg, raw2

Canned tuna in water, drained leads 6–2 · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Canned tuna in water, drained comes out ahead, winning 6 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Canned tuna in water, drained for more protein, less sugar, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium and more magnesium.

Pick Whole egg, raw for more calcium and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    116 kcal
    143 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN25.51 g
    12.56 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0.72 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN0 g
    0.37 g
  • Total fat
    0.82 g
    9.51 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.23 g
    3.13 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN50 mg
    142 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN237 mg
    138 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    11 mg
    56 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    1.53 mg
    1.75 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN27 mg
    12 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Canned tuna in water, drained vs Whole egg, raw · Foodatron