Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Capon, roasted Leader
Capon, roasted6
VS
Chicken back, cooked
Chicken back, cooked1

Capon, roasted leads 6–1 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Capon, roasted comes out ahead, winning 6 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Capon, roasted for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Chicken back, cooked for more calcium.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    229 kcal
    239 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN28.96 g
    28.19 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total fat
    11.65 g
    13.16 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN3.26 g
    3.6 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN49 mg
    96 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN255 mg
    237 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    14 mg
    24 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.49 mg
    1.39 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN24 mg
    22 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Capon, roasted vs Chicken back, cooked · Foodatron