Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Capon, roasted Leader
Capon, roasted5
VS
Chicken giblets, cooked
Chicken giblets, cooked3

Capon, roasted leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Capon, roasted comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Capon, roasted for more protein, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium and more magnesium.

Pick Chicken giblets, cooked for less saturated fat, more iron and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    229 kcal
    164 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN28.96 g
    26.39 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0.76 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    11.65 g
    5.4 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    3.26 g
    1.77 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN49 mg
    55 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN255 mg
    153 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN14 mg
    13 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    1.49 mg
    6.8 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN24 mg
    20 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    9 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Capon, roasted vs Chicken giblets, cooked · Foodatron