Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Capon, roasted
Capon, roasted3
VS
Chicken gizzards, cooked Leader
Chicken gizzards, cooked4

Chicken gizzards, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chicken gizzards, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Capon, roasted for less sodium, more potassium and more magnesium.

Pick Chicken gizzards, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more calcium and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    229 kcal
    154 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    28.96 g
    30.39 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total fat
    11.65 g
    2.68 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    3.26 g
    0.67 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN49 mg
    56 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN255 mg
    179 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    14 mg
    17 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    1.49 mg
    3.19 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN24 mg
    3 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Capon, roasted vs Chicken gizzards, cooked · Foodatron