Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Capon, roasted
Capon, roasted2
VS
Chicken hearts, cooked Leader
Chicken hearts, cooked6

Chicken hearts, cooked leads 6–2 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Chicken hearts, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Capon, roasted for less sodium and more potassium.

Pick Chicken hearts, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    12.65 g
    14.28 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0.05 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    5.09 g
    4.28 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.42 g
    1.22 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN21.4 mg
    25.95 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN111.35 mg
    71.35 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    6.11 mg
    10.27 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.65 mg
    4.88 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    10.48 mg
    10.81 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0.97 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Capon, roasted vs Chicken hearts, cooked · Foodatron