Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Capon, roasted
Capon, roasted3
VS
Emu, cooked Leader
Emu, cooked4

Emu, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Emu, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Capon, roasted for more protein, less sodium and more calcium.

Pick Emu, cooked for less saturated fat, more potassium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    229 kcal
    163 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN28.96 g
    28.43 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total fat
    11.65 g
    4.65 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    3.26 g
    1.24 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN49 mg
    65 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    255 mg
    375 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN14 mg
    8 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    1.49 mg
    5.01 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    24 mg
    29 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Capon, roasted vs Emu, cooked · Foodatron