Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Capon, roasted
Capon, roasted3
VS
Pheasant, cooked Leader
Pheasant, cooked5

Pheasant, cooked leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Pheasant, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Capon, roasted for less saturated fat, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Pheasant, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    229 kcal
    239 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    28.96 g
    32.4 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total fat
    11.65 g
    12.1 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN3.26 g
    3.91 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    49 mg
    43 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    255 mg
    271 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    14 mg
    16 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.49 mg
    1.43 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN24 mg
    22 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    2.3 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Capon, roasted vs Pheasant, cooked · Foodatron