Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Capon, roasted Leader
Capon, roasted5
VS
Quail, cooked
Quail, cooked3

Capon, roasted leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Capon, roasted comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Capon, roasted for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium and more magnesium.

Pick Quail, cooked for more calcium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    229 kcal
    227 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN28.96 g
    25.1 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total fat
    11.65 g
    14.1 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN3.26 g
    3.96 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN49 mg
    52 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN255 mg
    216 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    14 mg
    15 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    1.49 mg
    4.43 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN24 mg
    22 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    2.3 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Capon, roasted vs Quail, cooked · Foodatron