Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Capon, roasted Leader
Capon, roasted4
VS
Turkey breast, cooked
Turkey breast, cooked3

Capon, roasted leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Capon, roasted: 100 g · Turkey breast, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Capon, roasted comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Capon, roasted for less sodium, more potassium, more calcium and more iron.

Pick Turkey breast, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    229 kcal
    147 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    28.96 g
    30.13 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total fat
    11.65 g
    2.08 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    3.26 g
    0.59 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN49 mg
    99 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN255 mg
    249 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN14 mg
    9 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.49 mg
    0.71 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    24 mg
    32 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Capon, roasted vs Turkey breast, cooked · Foodatron