Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken back, cooked
Chicken back, cooked2
VS
Chicken breast with skin, roasted Leader
Chicken breast with skin, roasted5

Chicken breast with skin, roasted leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Chicken back, cooked: 100 g · Chicken breast with skin, roasted: 100 g.

The verdict

Chicken breast with skin, roasted comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken back, cooked for more calcium and more iron.

Pick Chicken breast with skin, roasted for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    239 kcal
    197 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    28.19 g
    29.8 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    13.16 g
    7.78 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    3.6 g
    2.19 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    96 mg
    71 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    237 mg
    245 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN24 mg
    14 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.39 mg
    1.07 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    22 mg
    27 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken back, cooked vs Chicken breast with skin, roasted · Foodatron