Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken back, cooked
Chicken back, cooked2
VS
Chicken liver, cooked Leader
Chicken liver, cooked6

Chicken liver, cooked leads 6–2 · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chicken liver, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken back, cooked for more protein and more calcium.

Pick Chicken liver, cooked for less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber and sugar.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    239 kcal
    167 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN28.19 g
    24.46 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0.87 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    13.16 g
    6.51 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    3.6 g
    2.06 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    96 mg
    76 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    237 mg
    263 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN24 mg
    11 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    1.39 mg
    11.63 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    22 mg
    25 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    27.9 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken back, cooked vs Chicken liver, cooked · Foodatron