Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken back, cooked Leader
Chicken back, cooked5
VS
Chicken, meat and skin, roasted
Chicken, meat and skin, roasted2

Chicken back, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Chicken back, cooked: 100 g · Chicken, meat and skin, roasted: 100 g.

The verdict

Chicken back, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken back, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium and more iron.

Pick Chicken, meat and skin, roasted for less sodium and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    239 kcal
    239 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN28.19 g
    27.3 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    13.16 g
    13.6 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN3.6 g
    3.79 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    96 mg
    82 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN237 mg
    223 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN24 mg
    15 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.39 mg
    1.26 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    22 mg
    23 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken back, cooked vs Chicken, meat and skin, roasted · Foodatron