Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken back, cooked Leader
Chicken back, cooked5
VS
Chicken wing, raw
Chicken wing, raw2

Chicken back, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chicken back, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken back, cooked for more protein, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Chicken wing, raw for less saturated fat and less sodium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    239 kcal
    191 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN28.19 g
    17.52 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    13.16 g
    12.85 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    3.6 g
    3.54 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    96 mg
    84 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN237 mg
    187 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN24 mg
    11 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.39 mg
    0.46 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN22 mg
    16 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken back, cooked vs Chicken wing, raw · Foodatron