Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken back, cooked
Chicken back, cooked2
VS
Duck breast, cooked Leader
Duck breast, cooked5

Duck breast, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Duck breast, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken back, cooked for more protein and more calcium.

Pick Duck breast, cooked for less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber and magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    239 kcal
    123 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN28.19 g
    19.85 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    13.16 g
    4.25 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    3.6 g
    1.32 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    96 mg
    57 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    237 mg
    268 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN24 mg
    3 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    1.39 mg
    4.51 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    22 mg
    22 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    6.2 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken back, cooked vs Duck breast, cooked · Foodatron