Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken back, cooked Leader
Chicken back, cooked5
VS
Duck with skin, roasted
Duck with skin, roasted2

Chicken back, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Chicken back, cooked: 100 g · Duck with skin, roasted: 100 g.

The verdict

Chicken back, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken back, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium and more magnesium.

Pick Duck with skin, roasted for less sodium and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    239 kcal
    337 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN28.19 g
    18.99 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    13.16 g
    28.35 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN3.6 g
    9.67 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    96 mg
    59 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN237 mg
    204 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN24 mg
    11 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    1.39 mg
    2.7 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN22 mg
    16 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken back, cooked vs Duck with skin, roasted · Foodatron