Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken back, cooked
Chicken back, cooked2
VS
Goose, meat only, roasted Leader
Goose, meat only, roasted5

Goose, meat only, roasted leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Goose, meat only, roasted comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken back, cooked for less saturated fat and more calcium.

Pick Goose, meat only, roasted for more protein, less sodium, more potassium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    239 kcal
    238 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    28.19 g
    28.97 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    13.16 g
    12.67 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN3.6 g
    4.56 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    96 mg
    76 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    237 mg
    388 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN24 mg
    14 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    1.39 mg
    2.87 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    22 mg
    25 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken back, cooked vs Goose, meat only, roasted · Foodatron