Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken back, cooked
Chicken back, cooked2
VS
Pheasant, cooked Leader
Pheasant, cooked5

Pheasant, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Pheasant, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken back, cooked for less saturated fat and more calcium.

Pick Pheasant, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    11.79 g
    13.56 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    5.51 g
    5.06 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.51 g
    1.64 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    40.17 mg
    17.99 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    99.16 mg
    113.39 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN10.04 mg
    6.69 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    0.58 mg
    0.6 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    9.21 mg
    9.21 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0.96 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken back, cooked vs Pheasant, cooked · Foodatron